As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Retro design pick

Smeg ECF01 Review

By the CremaCompare team · Updated

A 1950s-style espresso machine in many colors, with a thermoblock heater, a 15-bar pump and a steam wand with a cappuccino attachment.

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Smeg ECF01 (ECF01)
Best for: Style-conscious buyers who want a simple machine that matches a retro kitchen
Buy on Amazon 🏬 Other stores: official Smeg website

Key specs

Width × depth × height15.2 × 33 × 30.5 cm
Weight5 kg
Water tank1 L
TypeSemi-automatic (no grinder)
Built-in grinderNo
Milk frothingSteam wand with cappuccino attachment
PortafilterNot published
Price tierMid-range (see Amazon for today's price)

Specs are from the manufacturer. Always confirm on the Amazon listing before buying, including that it is a 230 V model with a UK plug.

Plugs and voltage in your country →

Pros

  • Retro design in several colors
  • Slim, about 15 cm (6 in) wide
  • Takes ground coffee or ESE pods
  • Simple one-cup and two-cup buttons

Cons

  • No grinder
  • You pay extra for the design
  • Basic controls with little adjustment

Overview

The ECF01 is all about design: chrome details, a retro shape and a long list of colors. Inside is a thermoblock heater and a 15-bar pump.

It is simple to use, with buttons for one or two cups and a steam lever, and it accepts ground coffee or ESE paper pods.

Who should skip it

You want the most espresso performance for the money, or a built-in grinder.

What else you will need

🎬 Video guides

Videos by the maker or independent creators on YouTube. They load only when you tap play.

How to use it

How to use the SMEG ECF01 · SMEG Support UK

Cleaning and descaling

How to descale the SMEG ECF01 · My Appliance Guide

Verdict

Choose it if looks matter as much as coffee; for similar money, plainer machines offer more control.

Check today's price on Amazon

Alternatives to consider

Related buying guides

See the full comparison table →

↑